The Government has approved plans for a large new Chinese embassy near the Tower of London, ending years of debate over security concerns. The site, purchased by China in 2018 for over £200 million, would become the largest Chinese embassy in Europe. Ministers say national security has been their foremost consideration, stressing that intelligence agencies were involved throughout the process and that extensive mitigation measures are in place. However, critics across the political spectrum have condemned the decision. Conservative, Liberal Democrat, and Reform UK figures argue the embassy’s size and location could increase the risk of espionage and intimidation, particularly toward dissidents living in the UK. MI5 has acknowledged that security risks cannot be entirely eliminated, though it judged the safeguards to be proportionate. Supporters of the decision say approving the embassy reflects pragmatic engagement with a major global power and helps maintain diplomatic dialogue on trade, security, and human rights. Opponents warn it sends the wrong signals about Britain’s willingness to stand firm on national security and democratic values.

Concerns are growing in the UK over plans for a vast new Chinese embassy in London, amid warnings it could become a major hub for espionage across Europe. Unredacted planning documents reveal a concealed underground chamber positioned close to fibre-optic cables carrying sensitive financial and internet data for the City of London and Canary Wharf. Security experts say the scale of the underground facilities raises serious questions about potential intelligence-gathering activities. The proposed embassy, near the Tower of London, would be China’s largest diplomatic outpost in Europe. MPs, former intelligence officials, and international partners have urged the Government to block the development, citing China’s designation as a hostile state in multiple security briefings. Despite assurances that national security concerns have been assessed, critics argue the risks remain unacceptable. The debate highlights the need to safeguard critical infrastructure, sovereignty, and democratic freedoms in an increasingly contested global environment.

London’s Chinese embassy called Liz Truss’s trip to Taiwan a ‘dangerous political stunt’ which will bring nothing but harm to the UK. In a pre-briefed extract of her speech to the Prospect Foundation, Truss was expected to say, ‘Last summer Rishi Sunak described China as the biggest long-term threat to Britain, and he promised to close all thirty of UK’s Confucius Institutes, which promote Chinese culture on campus in higher education and in some British schools. Sunak was right; we need to see those policies enacted urgently. Confucius Institutes must close, and the service supplied by Hong Kong and Taiwanese nationals in the UK on a free basis.’ The embassy urged Truss to stop supporting ‘Taiwan independence’. Taiwan has been separate from the People’s Republic of China since 1949, but Beijing insists on reuniting Taiwan with the mainland, by force if necessary.